As frequent, because this terminology indicates such different indicates those, I must describe what type of e-learning we're talking about about here: the problem is with exciting, self-study elements used on your personal pc. We're not talking about online workshops, unique sessions, videos, public learning and all those other outstanding products.
So what is the problem with self-study e-learning? Well, if you go to the awards actions and you check out situation analysis, you'd think the technique was increasing. That's because there is some awesome e-learning being designed which achieves awesome outcomes, not just with regards to performance but important, exciting learning actions. From my system here in the UK, I have been especially satisfied with what we have been able to obtain on this small region, at least now and again.
The problem is that, although there are jewels, there is just too much dross. You won't find out this out by talking to learning managers or producers, but reduced stage learning experts and learners themselves will tell you all too quickly. They hate that things that allows you to think that you are taking from a fire place hose, with it's unlimited abstractions, irrelevant style and patronisingly easy emails. And, will, you'd think that too, if you had to use it yourself (I bet you don't).
Unfortunately, throwing money at the problem is not enough. You get dross with jewellery, hogs put on lip shine. Good e-learning needs great connections capabilities, issue with your audiences, a really outstanding understanding of how people understand, an appreciation of the opportunities that technology are able and, above all, an ability to take a job up to clients and subject experts who want you to adhere to the fire place hose.
So, I'm with Eileen, Jules, Clark and Will. I talk about their values:
• Real impact over unexamined effort
• Meaningful learning over details delivery
• Spaced work out over one-time events
• Realistic options over details tests
• Emotional participation over non-active content
• Authentic circumstances over very subjective principles
• Real-world effects over didactic feedback
• Conceptual styles over divided information
• Learning performance over posting efficiency
• Individualized complications over set content
I wish there is the perfect react to the Serious eLearning Manifesto and that look for methods to address the malaise. If not, it's only a question of your before our clients will reduce patience and look to other media for solutions - and that will be a authentic opportunity missed. Seriously.
0 comments: